Working conditions and self-management of diabetes mellitus type II: exploratory systematic review
SANUS Vol 7_PORTADA
PDF (Español)
PDF
XML (Español)

Keywords

Self-management
Diabetes mellitus type 2
Working conditions

How to Cite

1.
Chávez Ramos WJ, Gallegos Cabriales EC. Working conditions and self-management of diabetes mellitus type II: exploratory systematic review. SANUS Rev Enf [Internet]. 2022 Aug. 3 [cited 2024 Aug. 31];7(18):e267. Available from: https://sanus.unison.mx/index.php/Sanus/article/view/267

Metrics

Abstract

Introduction: The self-management of diabetes mellitus implies a set of activities that people have to perform in order to meet therapeutic, pharmacological, and dietary and personal hygiene measures recommended. There are factors of the labor environment that increases the risk to develop the illness; however, its relationship with self-management of those who already have the illness is not very clear yet.

Objective: Explore available evidence about the subject of working conditions and self-management of diabetes mellitus type II. Methodology: Exploratory  systematic revision in databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Scielo, and Citation Index, eligibility criteria, quantitative and qualitative studies in human beings, opinions of experts and conference reports, using the concepts of diabetes mellitus type 2, working conditions and self-management. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses were used; five phases of study were used, obtaining a final sample of six articles. Results: Of the articles, 1840 workers from 20 to 65 years of age were reported; from this amount 56% were male. The working conditions included shift and working hours, psychosocial stress, work load and control, social activities, non-scheduled work, illness self-report, satisfaction with work and type of occupation. For the self-management of the illness the metabolic control, glucose control, health status, diet, exercise, and essential practices in diabetes were included.  Conclusions: The absence of conceptual definitions, the difference between operational definitions and empiric indicators and the scares information available made difficult the comparison of results and the establishment of the relation between the study variables.

https://doi.org/10.36789/revsanus.vi1.267
PDF (Español)
PDF
XML (Español)

References

International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes atlas ninth edition [Internet]. 2019 [cited Dec 10, 2019]. Available at: https://www.diabetesatlas.org/es/resources/

Lara OL, Martínez de Santelices CA, Lardoeyt FR, Lemus VM. Interacción genoma-ambiente en la diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Acta Médica del Centro [Internet]. 2018 [cited 09 dec 2019];12(4):429-439. Available at: http://www.revactamedicacentro.sld.cu/index.php/amc/article/view/948/1200

American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes [Internet]. 2021 [cited 13 sep 2020]. Available at: https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/diacare/suppl/2020/12/09/44.Supplement_1.DC1/DC_44_S1_final_copyright_stamped.pdf

Campo GN, Portillo MC. El automanejo de los pacientes con diabetes tipo 2: una revisión narrativa. Anales del Sistema Sanitario de Navarra [Internet]. 2013 [cited 20 dec 2019];35(3):489-504. Available at: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1137-66272013000300014

Jones V, Crowe M. How people from ethnic minorities describe their experiences of managing type-2 diabetes mellitus: a qualitative meta-synthesis. International Journal of Nursing Studies [Internet]. 2017 [cited 09 nov 2019];76:78-91. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.08.016

Luo X, Liu T, Yuan X, Ge S, Yang J, Li C, et al. Factors influencing self-management in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International journal of environmental research and public health [Internet]. 2015 [cited 15 nov 2019];12(9):11304-11327. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/9/11304

Vetter C, Dashti H, Lane J, Anderson S, Schernhammer E, Rutter M, et al. Night shift work, genetic risk, an type 2 diabetes in the UK biobank. Diabetes Care [Internet]. 2018 [cited 03 nov 2019];41:762-769. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc17-1933

Kivimäki M, Virtanen M, Kawachi I, Nyberg S, Alfredsson L, Batty G, et al. Long working hours, socioeconomic status, and the risk of incident type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of published and unpublished data from 222120 individuals. Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology [Internet]. 2015 [cited 05 nov 2019];3:27-34. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4286814/

Knutsson A, Kempe A. Shift work and diabetes – a systematic review. Chronobiology International [Internet]. 2014 [cited 18 nov 2019];31(10):1146-1151. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25290038/

Munn Z, Peters M, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC medical research methodology [Internet]. 2018 [cited 11 dec 2019];18(1):143. Available at: https://bmcmedresmethodol.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

Arksey H, O´Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International journal of social research methodology [Internet]. 2005 [cited 20 dec 2019];8(1):19-32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Urrútia G, Bonfill X. Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sitemáticas y metaanálisis. Medicina clínica [Internet]. 2010 [cited 15 dec 2019];135(11):507-511. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals [Internet]. 2015 [cited 15 nov 2020]. Available at: http://www.icmje.org/

Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology. STROBE Checklist: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies (combined). [Internet]. 2020 [cited 15 nov 2020]. Available at: https://www.strobe-statement.org/

Rodrigues T, Canani L. A influência do turno de trabalho em pacientes com diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira [Internet]. 2008 [cited 05 nov 2019];54(2):160-162. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-42302008000200021

Sato M, Yamazaki Y. Work‐related factors associated with self‐care and psychological health among people with type 2 diabetes in Japan. Nursing & health sciences [Internet]. 2012 [cited 20 nov 2019];14(4):520-527. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2012.00729.x

Annor F, Roblin D, Okosun S, Goodman M. Work-related psychosocial stress and glycemic control among working adults with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews [Internet]. 2015 [cited 15 dec 2019];9(2):85-90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2015.02.003

Chalernvanichakorn T, Sithisarankul P, Hiransuthikul N. Shift work and type 2 diabetic patients’ health. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand [Internet]. 2011 [cited 20 dec 2019];91(7):1093. Available at: http://www.jmatonline.com/index.php/jmat/article/view/610

Davila E, Florez H, Trepka M, Fleming L, Niyonsenga, T, Lee D, et al. Long work hours is associated with suboptimal glycemic control among US workers with diabetes. American journal of industrial medicine [Internet]. 2011 [cited 08 nov 2019];54(5):375-383. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20923

Azami Y, Funakoshi M, Matsumoto H, Ikota A, Ito K, Okimoto H, et al. Long working hours and skipping breakfast concomitant with late evening meals are associated with suboptimal glycemic control among young male Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. Journal of diabetes investigation [Internet]. 2019 [cited 10 nov 2019];10(1):73-83. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111%2Fjdi.12852

International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Atlas Ninth Edition. [Internet]. 2019 [cited Nov 15, 2019]. Available at: http://www.diabetesatlas.org/

Durán, MA. Tiempo de vida y tiempo de trabajo. 1ª. ed. España: Fundación BBVA; 2010.

Oficina Internacional del Trabajo. Factores psicosociales en el trabajo: naturaleza, incidencia y prevención. [Internet]. Ginebra; 1984 [cited 25 nov 2020]. Available at: http://www.factorespsicosociales.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/FPS-OIT-OMS.pdf http://www.factorespsicosociales.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/FPS-OIT-OMS.pdf

Burr H, Berhelsen H, Moncada S, Nübling M, Dupret D, Demiral Y, et al. The third version of the Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire. safety and health at work [Internet]. 2019 [cited 20 dec 2019];10(4):483-503. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2019.10.002

Asociación Latinoamericana de Diabetes. Guías asociación latinoamericana de diabetes 2019 [Internet]. 2019 [cited 02 jan 2020]. Available at: https://www.revistaalad.com/guias/5600AX191_guias_alad_2019.pdf

National Kidney Foundation. Hypertension in CKD. Professional education resource center [Internet]. 2019 [cited 11 jan 2020]. Available at: https://education.kidney.org/

Knutsson A, Kempe A. Shift work and diabetes- a systematic review. Chronobiology international [Internet]. 2014 [cited 15 jan 2020];31(10):1146-1151. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2014.957308

Kivimäki M, Jokela M, Nyberg S, Singh-Manoux A, Fransson E, Alfredsson L, et al. Long working hours and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished data for 603 838 individuals. The Lancet [Internet]. 2015 [cited 02 jan 2020];386(10005):1739-1746. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60295-1

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.