Abstract
Introduction: Pregnancy is a stage in which women are vulnerable, so care within hospital institutions during childbirth has a significant impact on their physical and mental health. Obstetric violence is one that is exercised within health institutions against pregnant women during childbirth care, and is still an important public health problem in Mexico. Objective: The objective of the present study is to know the perception of the users of the health services about the existence of obstetric violence. Methodology: Quantitative, descriptive study. The type of sampling was for convenience through the snowball technique, 45 participants were included. The data collection was through the Test to denounce obstetric violence in hospitals in Extremadura, adapted to the Mexican population, consists of 11 dichotomous questions. Results: 37.7% of the surveyed women perceived some type of obstetric violence by health personnel. The order of not walking (51.1%), criticism of crying or screaming (44.4%), being unable to express fears or concerns (37.8%), nicknames or diminutives (28.9%), deny changes in position and deny contact with the newborn (26.7%) and ironic comments, disqualifying, jokes (22.2%). Conclusions: Although the highest percentages are not inclined to affirmative in relation to actions considered as acts of obstetric violence, it is of great relevance to emphasize that these acts are present in considerable percentages.
References
Aguirre A, Martínez B, Rivero K, Blancas C, Badillo S, González L, et al. La atención del parto: poder, derechos, violencia. Revista Salud Quintana Roo. 2013; 6(25): p. 21-5.
Pereira C, Domínguez A, Toro J. Violencia Obstetrica desde la perspectiva de la paciente. Revista de Obstetricia y Ginecologia de Venezuela. 2015; 75(2): p. 81-90.
Soto-Toussaint L. Violencia Obstétrica. Revista Mexicana de Anestesiología. 2016 Abril-Junio; 39(S1): p. S55-S60.
Pintado-Cucarella S. Síndrome de desgaste profesional en médicos y percepciónde la violencias obstétrica. Gineco Obstet Méx. 2015; 83: p. 173-8.
Tinoco MT. Propuesta para la prevención y atención de violencia institucional en la atención obstétrica en México. Revista CONAMED. 2016; 21(1): p. 48-54.
Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Declaración de la OMS sobre tasas de cesárea. [Online].; 2015 [cited 2016 Mayo 06. Available from: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/maternal_perinatal_health/cs-statement/es/
Valdez-Santiago R, E HS, Mojarro-Iñiguez M, Arenas-Monreal L. Nueva evidencia a un viejo problema: el abuso de las mujeres en las salas de parto. REvista CONAMED. 2013; 18(1): p. 14-20.
Camacaro M, Ramírez M, Lanza L, Herrera M. Conductas de rutina en la atención al parto constitutivas de violencia obstétrica. Notas y debates de actualidad. 2015; 20(68): p. 113-20.
Teran P, Castellanos C, González M, Ramos D. Violencia obstetrica: percepción de las usuarias. Revista Venezolana Gineco-obstetrica. 2013; 73(3): p. 171-80.
[DOF], Diario Oficial de la Federación. Ley General de Salud: Reglamento de la Ley General de Salud en Materia de Investigación para la Salud. México:; 1984.
Grupo de Información en Reproducción Elegida [GIRE]. Violencia obstétrica en leyes de acceso a una vida libre de violencia. [Online].; 2015 [cited 2016 Agosto 15]. Available from: https://gire.org.mx/consultations/leyes-locales-de-acceso-a-una-vida-libre-de-violencia/?type=
Villanueva L, Ahuja M, Valdez R, Lezana M. ¿De qué hablamos cuando hablamos de violencia obstétrica? Revista CONAMED. 2016; 21(S1): p. 7-25.
Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). Episiotomía en el parto vaginal. [Online].; 2008 [cited 2016 Diciembre. Available from: https://extranet.who.int/rhl/es/topics/pregnancy-and-childbirth/care-during-childbirth/care-during-labour-2nd-stage-6
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2017